Research and Studies

Network Paper 37: A Bridge Too Far

Aid Agencies and the Military in Humanitarian Response

Networkpaper037 png

Since the early 1990s, military forces have become

increasingly involved in humanitarian assistance. This

encroachment into what has traditionally been seen

as ‘humanitarian space‘ raises significant issues of

principle, as well as policy and operational questions

not only for humanitarian agencies, but also for the

international community as a whole. These questions

have only become more urgent in the wake of the war

in Afghanistan following the attacks of 11 September,

and the increasingly explicit linkage of military, political

and humanitarian aims that it has engendered.

Some analysts consider this merging of humanitarian,

political and military roles and goals inevitable,

practical and desirable. Others believe that, in the

attempt to bring political, military and humanitarian

objectives within the same framework, there is a

danger that humanitarian objectives and principles

will be compromised; as a result, the capacity to alleviate

suffering will be diminished. Still others take a

pragmatic approach to civil–military cooperation,

establishing policy and negotiating the more

contentious ‘grey areas’ on a case-by-case basis.

Despite its importance, the debate over the proper

roles of humanitarian actors and military forces and

the relationship between them is relatively young and

anecdotal. Detailed analysis is lacking, and few

guidelines for policy or practice have been developed.

This paper aims to clarify the key issues of

debate, and puts forward recommendations to further

dialogue, and to guide policy and practice.

Download main report file

Download file