The evaluation was designed to identify the effectiveness of U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)-funded activities in contributing to a peaceful Kenya.
Using an overall mixed methodology, it examined the activities and approaches of six implementing partners (IPs):
- the Kenya Civil Society Strengthening Program (KCSSP)
- Kenya Tuna Uwezo (KTU)
- Rift Valley Local Empowerment for Peace (LEAP II)
- People to People Peace Activity (3Ps)
- Reporting for Peace, and Land and Conflict Sensitive Journalism in Kenya (L&CSJ)
- Peace Initiative Kenya (PIK).
The evaluation seeks to answer six questions:
- In what ways did USAID/Kenya conflict mitigation approaches contribute to peace during the 2013 general election?
- To what extent have these identified approaches addressed root causes of conflict?
- To what extent have attitudes and perceptions of individuals and communities changed toward peace and conflict in the targeted areas?
- What components are likely to continue to influence conflict mitigation after program closure?
- To what extent did USAID/Kenya strengthen civil society organizations’ — especially local partners’ — ability to implement and manage conflict mitigation programs?
- What key lessons and good practices can be identified for future USAID/Kenya conflict mitigation and civil society strengthening programming?