Bibliography

ALNAP (2025) The Global Humanitarian Assistance (GHA) report. London: ALNAP/ODI (https://alnap.org/help-library/resources/global-humanitarian-assistance-gha-report-2025-e-report/).

Care (2025) ‘South Sudan faces deadly cholera outbreak’. News release, 27 February (www.care.org/media-and-press/south-sudan-faces-deadly-cholera-outbreak/).

ICRC – International Committee of the Red Cross (2022) ‘Mali: quand les personnes déplacées payent un lourd tribut au conflit armé’, November. Geneva: ICRC (www.icrc.org/fr/document/mali-quand-les-personnes-deplacees-payent-un-lourd-tribut-au-conflit-arme).

IOM – International Organization for Migration (2025) ‘Arrivals from Sudan to South Sudan: displacement tracking matrix’, March. Geneva: IOM (https://dtm.iom.int/node/25851). [JF1]

OCHA (UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs) (2025a) ‘2024 South Sudan humanitarian response in review’. Geneva: OCHA (https://reliefweb.int/report/south-sudan/2024-south-sudan-humanitarian-response-review).

OCHA (2025b) ‘Message from Emergency Relief Coordinator Tom Fletcher to the humanitarian community’, March. Geneva: OCHA (https://www.unocha.org/news/humanitarian-reset-10-march-2025).

OCHA (2025c) ‘Mali HNRP 2025’, January. Geneva: OCHA (https://humanitarianaction.info/plan/1222/article/mali-hnrp-2025).

USAID (United States Agency for International Development) (2024) ‘South Sudan – complex emergency fact sheet #1, fiscal year (FY) 2025’. Washington, DC: USAID (https://reliefweb.int/report/south-sudan/south-sudan-complex-emergency-fact-sheet-1-fiscal-year-fy-2025).

Chapter 1: Introduction

  1. The targeted locations were selected in coordination with the respective country teams, based on several criteria: the presence of humanitarian activities, the presence of displaced populations and accessibility to the sites. For the KIIs with humanitarian actors, no specific geographic locations were targeted, as interviews were conducted with actors operating at different levels and locations across the response.

    View footnote source

Conclusion

  1. It is important to note that, given the time of data collection, the experiences and perspectives expressed in KIIs and FGDs may not reflect more recent in-country impacts and newer prioritisation processes, including subsequent HPC processes.

    View footnote source