Monitoring of humanitarian action

Community led sanitation, Lao
Photo: World Bank / Viengsompasong Inthavong | CC BY NC ND 2.0

When providing relief to people affected by crisis, how do we know if we’re doing it right? How do we know what we need to change to improve? For many humanitarian organisations, this is hard to know.

Little progress has been made on the monitoring front and three issues in particular keep coming up: how to use qualitative methods to collect data; how to monitor the outcomes of programmes; and how to make M&E more useful for decision-making at project level. ALNAP has published three papers exploring each of these issues and looking at ways of fixing them.

This content is not shown because you have denied third-party cookies. You can view it at https://youtu.be/ifcqrTei6po?si=c8KsEH67OChdbcvk, or update your cookie settings

Improving monitoring in humanitarian action

This animation summarises the findings of the ALNAP paper Back to the Drawing Board, which looks into what is currently being done to measure outcomes and how it can be improved in the future.

This content is not shown because you have denied third-party cookies. You can view it at https://youtu.be/rzoDPLaEWC4, or update your cookie settings

Qualitative Approaches to Monitoring

This animation summarises the findings of the ALNAP paper Beyond the Numbers, which looks at potential ways to improve the capture and uptake of qualitative data in monitoring of humanitarian programmes.

This content is not shown because you have denied third-party cookies. You can view it at https://youtu.be/Ea0_jw_fvt8, or update your cookie settings

How to Improve Outcomes Monitoring

This animation summarises the findings of the ALNAP paper 'Back to the Drawing Board', which looks into what is currently being done to measure outcomes and how it can be improved in the future.

Read report

Find out more

ALNAP Learning Links: M&E pack

Explore curated M&E resources