Humanitarian publications and multimedia

Commentary
Back to square one in joint humanitarian evaluations?

When donors and aid agencies concluded their Grand Bargain in 2016, a commitment was made to reduce individual donor(-commissioned) evaluations. Supposedly, the intention was not only to save costs and …
- Monitoring & Evaluation
Tool(kits)/guidelines
Evaluation of Protection in Humanitarian Action Guide

Protection-specific insights for evaluators and evaluation commissioners
- Monitoring & Evaluation
Commentary
Revisiting the criteria: Why the consultation on the OECD DAC should be your priority

Last week's European Evaluation Society 2018 conference brought about a really rich debate on the OECD DAC criteria. It came in the context of the OECD’s consultation regarding the use …
- Monitoring & Evaluation
Commentary
Why should I care about evaluation?

4 reasons that explain why evaluations matter.
- Monitoring & Evaluation
Report
What is Monitoring in Humanitarian Action? Describing Practice and Identifying Challenges

A review of the current state of the practice of Monitoring
- Monitoring & Evaluation
Tool(kits)/guidelines
Guía de Evaluación de la Acción Humanitaria

ALNAP's Spanish language EHA guidance provides guidance to support evaluation practitioners
- Monitoring & Evaluation
Commentary
What does the UK election campaign mean for aid evaluation?

Ahead of the United Kingdom's general election, the three major parties have now pledged to maintain at least 0.7% of gross national income on overseas aid. But in a world …
- Monitoring & Evaluation
Summary
Strengthening the quality of evidence in humanitarian evaluations

Details:Language: EnglishPages: 40ppCitation: Christoplos, I. with Knox-Clarke, P. Cosgrave, J. Bonino, F. and Alexander, J. (2017) Strengthening the quality of evidence in humanitarian evaluations. ALNAP Method Note. London: ALNAP/ODI.
- Monitoring & Evaluation
Commentary
Four lessons learned from synthesising humanitarian evidence

Key insights about the humanitarian evidence base and the process of synthesising existing research.
- Monitoring & Evaluation
Tool(kits)/guidelines
Evaluation of Humanitarian Action (EHA) Guide

ALNAP's EHA guidance provides guidance to support evaluation practitioners.
- Monitoring & Evaluation
Commentary
Communicating evaluation to non-evaluators

How to balance accessible messaging with nuance and balance.
- Monitoring & Evaluation
Report
Using Evaluation for a Change: Insights from humanitarian practitioners

A simple framework on strengthening humanitarian evaluation capacities
- Monitoring & Evaluation
Commentary
Five things to consider when evaluating cash assistance

ALNAP and CaLP have come together to identify and analyse key issues in evaluation of cash assistance
- Monitoring & Evaluation
Tool(kits)/guidelines
Evaluating Humanitarian Action using the OECD-DAC Criteria

This guide provides practical support on how to use the OECD/DAC criteria
- Monitoring & Evaluation

Back
- 1
- 2
- 3

State of the Humanitarian System

Policy and practice

With learning comes change

Spotlight on learning

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

Learning from crises

Crises in focus

HELP LIBRARY

Publications & multimedia

Collections

Membership & governance

Get involved

Publications and multimedia

Back to square one in joint humanitarian evaluations?

Evaluation of Protection in Humanitarian Action Guide

Revisiting the criteria: Why the consultation on the OECD DAC should be your priority

Why should I care about evaluation?

What is Monitoring in Humanitarian Action? Describing Practice and Identifying Challenges

Guía de Evaluación de la Acción Humanitaria

What does the UK election campaign mean for aid evaluation?

Strengthening the quality of evidence in humanitarian evaluations

Four lessons learned from synthesising humanitarian evidence

Evaluation of Humanitarian Action (EHA) Guide

Communicating evaluation to non-evaluators

Using Evaluation for a Change: Insights from humanitarian practitioners

Five things to consider when evaluating cash assistance

Evaluating Humanitarian Action using the OECD-DAC Criteria