This paper reviews the core issues facing humanitarian decision-makers on who, where and what to prioritise in response planning. We provide a framework for making these decisions more ethical, transparent and participatory. We cover two main aspects of resource allocation: scope setting and prioritisation.
-
Acknowledgements
The authors and ALNAP thanks everyone who contributed to this research project.
-
Chapter 1
Introduction
This section outlines the structure of the paper into two main aspects of resource allocation: scope setting and prioritisation.
-
Chapter 2
Scope setting: defining humanitarian parameters
In this section, the focus is on understanding what the scope setting is as a first step in prioritisation.
-
Chapter 3
Prioritising
This chapter looks at in-depth at identifying what an ideal response would achieve and priority populations’ and ‘priority services’ through evidence and consultation.
-
Chapter 4
A 'pluralist' way forward for prioritising people and programmes
What follows is an illustration of how a pluralist ranked system might work for prioritising humanitarian resources for crisis response. In a ranked system, an agency or agencies would move …
-
Conclusion
In this section, you will find a summary of what the report contains
-
References
A list of sources used in the document