Introduction
Aid cuts in 2025 shocked the humanitarian system and forced it into hyper-prioritisation mode. As the year draws to a close, we reflect on this annus horribilis – humanitarian funding plummeted to levels not seen for a decade, while the numbers of people forcibly displaced and facing food insecurity are more than double those of 2016. We look back at how this shock played out and what it means for the year and decade ahead (see Figure 1).
Our analysis – which is the fourth in ALNAP’s recent series exploring prioritisation (ALNAP, 2025a-c) – draws on several months of research, surveys and consultations with humanitarian organisations. It will also feed into the forthcoming edition of the State of the Humanitarian System (SOHS) report, due to be published in 2026. As evidence in Mali and South Sudan (ALNAP, 2025a) shows, the real costs of the funding cuts have been paid in human suffering: from shortages in food to increases in sexual violence. This paper complements that research by looking at the implications for humanitarian organisations, how they have navigated the system shocks and prioritisation choices, and what this meant for their ability to support people in crises.